In a wide-ranging interview with Ted Chiang in the Los Angeles Review of Books (I love that their acronym is LARB), the acclaimed sci-fi author pushes back against the notion that mathematics could serve as a universal language: "Math can describe physical phenomena with incredible precision, but it's terrible at describing human experiences."
This made me stop for a moment. Let's say this is true, that we can't describe human experiences with math. And if we agree that what LLMs and the whole neural network project is trying to do exactly that (ie, simulate or approximate or generate human experiences